Articles
Impact of Direct Tax Code on Individual Investment Choices
Mahesh Kumar, Narinder Kaur, Vinod Kumar
Volume 32, Issue 2 (October 2011 to March 2012)Abstract
Download ArticleFinancial Inclusion in India: Retrospect and Prospects
Ritu Ranjan
Volume 35, Issue 1 (April 2014 to September 2014)Abstract
Download ArticleFactors influencing the Stock Purchase Decisions of Individual Investors of Punjab: An Empirical Study
Sangeeta Arora, Kanika Marwaha
Volume 34, Issue 2 (October 2013 to March 2014)Abstract
Download ArticleRevisiting CAPM and Fama French Three Factor Model in Indian Equity Market
Neharika Sobti
Volume 37, Issue 1 (April 2016 to September 2016)Abstract
Download ArticleSpeculation at the Indian Stock Exchanges
U.L. Gupta
Volume 2, Issue 3 (September 1969 to December 1969)Abstract
Download ArticleInvestors' Confidence in the Present Depository System and Response to Changed Strategy
Geeta Man Mohan
Volume 23, Issue 2 (July 2002 to December 2002)Abstract
Download ArticleActivity Based Costing : Concepts and Significance
S.N. Maheshwari & Suneel Maheshwari
Volume 14, Issue 1 (July 1993 to December 1993)Abstract
Download ArticleRecession hits Engineering Industry
R.N. Goyale
Volume 1, Issue 1 (January 1968 to June 1968)Abstract
Download ArticleAbsence of Financial Sector in Modern Macroeconomics: Oversight or Overlook
Avinash Kumar Jha
Volume 42, Issue 1 (January 2021 to June 2021)Abstract
Download ArticleThe paper explores the question of why modern macroeconomics ignores the financial sector in its analysis despite Keynes's crucial work on the link between expectations in financial markets and the economy's ability to restore full employment through price mechanism. It explores the evolution of the concept of liquidity trap in macroeconomics text-books and indicates the dilution in it over the decades. Further, the theoretical necessity of efficient market hypothesis for modern microeconomics to ignore the financial sector is elaborated. Policy implications about the economies in general, and the financial sector in particular are highlighted.
BACKTESTING VAR MODELS: THE CASE OF COMMODITIES
Devesh Shankar, Prateek Bedi, Shalini Agnihotri and Jappanjyot Kaur Kalra
Volume 38, Issue 1 (April 2017 to September 2017)Abstract
Download ArticleOne of the most widely used methods to quantify risk is ‘Value at Risk’. VaR models are useful only if they predict future risks accurately. This paper focuses on a comparative evaluation of three broad approaches to calculate VaR for nine commodities traded on Multi Commodity Exchange of India. The primary objective of the study is to identify the most accurate VaR model for each commodity in particular and commodity asset class in general. VaR is calculated using five different methods (two methods each of parametric & non-parametric approaches and one method of semi-parametric approach) for all nine commodities for a period of nine years starting October 2006 till October 2015. To identify the better performing VaR methods accurately, the analysis is performed in two phases, Pre-Crisis (October 2006 to December 2009) and Post Crisis (January 2010 to October 2015). Results suggest Volatility Weighted Historical Simulation (VWHS) VaR method has outperformed other methods in both parts of the analysis exhibiting a success ratio of 100% each time. We also conclude that the selection of similar or contrasting data periods in terms of market conditions for VaR calculation and VaR backtesting affects the performance of VaR methods in general. These findings are relevant for retail and institutional investors who hold commodities in their portfolios and traders who need to calculate VaR for their commodity portfolios.